[cma-l] DCMS consultation meetings on amendments to community radio law

Office - ccr-fm office at ccr-fm.co.uk
Fri Oct 14 11:51:18 BST 2011 

Dear All

Some more excellent points this time from Steve. Yet another voice adding to
the thousands and thousand who know full well this was a farce from the
start and still is.

On a positive and in a hypothetical situation, supposing everything was
removed and we (CCR) miraculously were funded by 4 separate reasonably sized
organisations to the tune of £20,000 grand each ....... then that is game
over     FULL-STOP !    if we were to gain some grant funding and a
reasonable guaranteed amount ''ten grand from a community fund''  then we
would possibly only need 3 ... maybe only 2 !?

The local commercial station would then have the WHOLE area and every
business in the region to go at to help swell their profits.

This has been a barking up the wrong tree exercise, a storm in a teacup,
scare mongering, discriminatory exercise that is not acceptable now and
never has been.

As I have said, whilst we wait for the dragging of the feet again, the
consultations, or the total lack of concern or interest from Mr Hunt and Co
we (CCR) have had enough and we are now not playing nicey nicey Mr Softy
any-longer ..... we've had a bellyfull, we're p.............eed off
completely, extremely frustrated and immensely angry            we will
search a way around this garbage, up, under, over, or completely around.
That we have done. We have laid the foundations over the past 2 years to
have a legal trail of what 'supporters''sponsors' etc have signed up for and
it will be proved in black and white in a Court of Law ..... in the
meantime, we will give away our adverts for free at our discretion.

In the event of ending up being charged with breaking the Law ... we'll av'
some of that as well and take our chances ..... there'll be no pushover at
this end ... trust me.

If the Government / DCMS want to prevent this wonderful community venture
from turning into a circus then they need to get off their backsides, stop
pandering to people who don't need it or deserve it and let people get on
with what they are supposed to be doing. One thing we are not meant to be
doing is getting completely stressed out whilst trying to push a huge rock
up 1/5 hill

I agree with virtually everything that has been put on this message board
over the past 4 days as do most of the community radio fraternity and many
of the Mr Fred Blogg's on the streets.

Some people got this one seriously wrong ... and it certainly WASN'T us !

Regards

Nick 

-----Original Message-----
From: cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk
[mailto:cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk] On Behalf Of Steve Buckley
Sent: 13 October 2011 20:11
To: Jaqui Devereux; cma-l
Subject: Re: [cma-l] DCMS consultation meetings on amendments to community
radio law

Hi Jaqui

Thanks for your note on the DCMS consultation. A 
sustainable funding basis for the sector remains 
the most pressing priority and whilst changes are 
needed, adjustment to the advertising rules is 
neither sufficient in itself, nor is it without 
some risks. Clearly the specific restrictions on 
stations overlapping with 'small' (less than 150k 
TSA) commercial radios are not and have never 
been justified, but the 50% rule does help assure 
the character of community radio and its 
distinctive treatment in law. It may be worth, 
however, examing other approaches to this. For 
example, Ireland and Italy, have a limit on how 
much advertising may be carried on air on 
community radio (5 mins and 3 mins per hour respectively).

I know some will argue for the complete removal 
of these restrictions and parity with commercial 
radio but that does tend to undermine the case 
for a proper funding mechanism for the sector. 
The most significant failure of the 2003 
Communications Act is the provision for a 
Community Radio Fund. This is partly a failure of 
implementation but it is also linked to the fact 
the legal provisions are not sufficiently robust. 
We argued at the time, and I strongly recommend 
we do so again, that a 'Community Media Fund' 
should be set up as a properly resourced 
independent public body, along the lines of the 
Gaelic Media Service http://www.mgalba.com/ 
(income £12.7m, 2011) which is also detailed in 
the 2003 Act: 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/part/3/chapter/1/crossheading/th
e-gaelic-media-service

There is one significant change I think CMA 
should make in its position today and that is to 
now unambigiously demand that the Community Media 
Fund should be partly funded through the BBC 
licence fee, at a rate that is an explicit 
percentage of the licence fee revenue as a whole. 
At the same time, the fund, independently 
administered, should be free to raise contributions from other sources.

The fact that the previous government was 
prepared to take £130m of BBC licence fee money 
for local news content, and the present 
government has announced £40m of BBC licence fee 
money for local TV, means there should be no 
ideological objection from either the government or the opposition.

We just need the political will.

Best wishes

Steve





At 13:51 13/10/2011, Jaqui Devereux wrote:
>Dear all
>
>The DCMS will be co-hosting a couple of meetings with us, probably in
>the New Year, to discuss possible amendments to the law on community
>radio, as part of the new Communications Bill.
>
>We are writing to ask your views on what the agenda should cover - we
>do have quite a few ideas on what you might want but would prefer you
>to tell us!
>
>Almost certainly community radio advertising rules (all of them) will
>be on the agenda, but what other subjects would you like on it?
>
>Please do let us know,
>
>Best wishes
>
>Jaqui
>
>--
>Jaqui Devereux
>Director, Community Media Association
>Community Media Association
>http://www.commedia.org.uk
>
>t: 0114 279 5219
>
>Canstream Internet Radio & Video
>http://www.canstream.co.uk/
>
>http://twitter.com/community_media
>https://www.facebook.com/CommunityMediaAssociation
>_______________________________________________
>
>Reply - cma-l at commedia.org.uk
>
>The cma-l mailing list is a members' service 
>provided by the Community Media Association - http://www.commedia.org.uk
>Twitter: http://twitter.com/community_media
>http://www.facebook.com/CommunityMediaAssociation
>Canstream Internet Radio & Video: http://www.canstream.co.uk/
>_______________________________________________
>
>Mailing list guidelines: 
>http://www.commedia.org.uk/about/cma-email-lists/email-list-guidelines/
>_______________________________________________
>
>To unsubscribe or manage your CMA-L mailing list subscription please visit:
>http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l


_______________________________________________

Reply - cma-l at commedia.org.uk

The cma-l mailing list is a members' service provided by the Community Media
Association - http://www.commedia.org.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/community_media
http://www.facebook.com/CommunityMediaAssociation
Canstream Internet Radio & Video: http://www.canstream.co.uk/
_______________________________________________

Mailing list guidelines:
http://www.commedia.org.uk/about/cma-email-lists/email-list-guidelines/
_______________________________________________

To unsubscribe or manage your CMA-L mailing list subscription please visit:
http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l

More information about the cma-l mailing list