[cma-l] FW: Weekend Digest
Murray Dawson
murray at shmu.org.uk
Tue Mar 8 20:52:15 GMT 2011
Sorry, I was replying from my phone in frustration at reading that the
best way forward was to give everyone the same - as been said a number
of times on the list, it's a bad idea.
Here's a suggestion to everyone who likes the idea of sharing out the
whole fund and making good use of the £2,000 they receive. Spend around
the 2hrs or so that it takes to complete an Awards for All Lottery
application, and if your project is sound, you're very likely to receive
£10,000 - five years worth of evenly shared out Community Radio Fund awards.
The key to all of this is outcomes - if you are delivering 'Social
Gain', you are ticking 'outcome' boxes for most of the major funders.
That's where the real, and sustainable money is (i.e. 3-5 year funding
arrangements).
Murray
On 08/03/2011 20:03, Associated Broadcast Consultants wrote:
> Seems like a great idea to me. Although some people think it's a
> "paltry sum", it would take our advertising a team a long time
> pounding the streets to raise £2k. That amount could go a long way to
> paying some of the fixed costs.
>
> Regarding the "never happen" comment, the same could arguably said
> about creating a larger fund!
>
> Glyn
>
> On 8 March 2011 16:33, Murray Dawson <murray at shmu.org.uk
> <mailto:murray at shmu.org.uk>> wrote:
>
> I think we'll have to agree to differ on this one Nick/Trevor.
> It'll never happen.
>
> Let's move on and concentrate on creating a larger fund.
>
> Murray
> --
>
> Murray Dawson
> Project Director
> Station House Media Unit
> Station Road, Woodside
> Aberdeen AB24 2WB
>
> t +44 1224 515013
> e murray at shmu.org.uk <mailto:murray at shmu.org.uk>
> w www.shmu.org.uk <http://www.shmu.org.uk>
>
>
> Office - ccr-fm <office at ccr-fm.co.uk <mailto:office at ccr-fm.co.uk>>
> wrote:
>
> Looks like one or two are starting to drift round to my way of
> thinking ?? quite interesting really. Get your 2K and
> THEN go back to your local MP and ask the question ‘’is
> someone taking the Michael ??’’ he might take
> you seriously …………….. however, with some getting £30,000 and
> others getting sod-all our whole ethos and the very basis of
> us pleading poverty all the time goes out the window.
>
> Have some faith in your whinging Uncle Nick ………….. at least
> try it for a couple of years ……………. Anything is better than
> the shambles we’ve got at the moment.
>
> The pot would grow of course by at least £100,000 coz’ you
> wouldn’t need a grants panel ! just a monkey with a cheque
> book …….. monkeeeee magic !
>
> Regards
>
> Nick
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:*cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk
> <mailto:cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk>
> [mailto:cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk
> <mailto:cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk>] *On Behalf Of
> *Ian Hickling
> *Sent:* 05 March 2011 16:34
> *To:* cma-l
> *Subject:* [cma-l] Weekend Digest
>
>
> Whilst I appreciate Trevor's desperation to get things done,
> sharing a paltry sum equally is no solution.
> The only sensible way to allocate a given sum is as at present
> - by application stressing need.
> But - as he says - we do need vastly more funding in addition
> to that which is available if you look - and fight - really hard.
> All the CR stations we deal with need to enhance their
> transmission systems to capture more listeners and thereby
> attract more funding.
> That would require a lot of money but it also needs Ofcom to
> clear every single new transmission application.
> Ofcom has said it cannot even consider any such applications
> at present because it has over 200 new potential stations to
> process and new broadcasters have precedence over existing
> licencees.
> That's another very real need that CMA needs to address please.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Weekend Digest
>
> It's been a busy week, and I have some comments to make. I
> must stress they are my personal opinions, and do not reflect
> the views of the Council, of which I am an elected member.
>
> This week Nick said that he believed the Community Radio Fund
> money should be shared equally. Whilst it remains at under
> £500K that gives each licensed station about £2k. At my
> station it means that our 100 volunteers can expect a cup of
> coffee occasionally. In any case we give £850 to OfCom just to
> hold a licence so the nett cost, after 20% VAT, will be marginal.
>
> Importantly it means we can tell all our listeners (is that an
> estimated 13 million) that we only receive £2K. I think the
> BBC's 44 stations spent over £600 million last year. So who
> gives value for money? We should
> tell our listeners how we are treated.
>
> If everyone gets the same money there will be no need for a
> committee to decide (I wonder what that costs in coffee and
> biscuits?). It will certainly save OfCom money.
>
> That anyone should judge whether a licensed station is more
> worthy than another is not a valid argument. OfCom issued the
> licence - so we are all worthy until exposed as charlatans.
>
> Such a paltry sum can be turned into a lever to make the
> government recognise our value. We can provide services they
> require - all they have to do is recognise our existence.
>
> This raises a much wider problem. We are all scrabbling around
> to find funders. Many stations employ full-time fundraisers,
> when it would be more productive to recognise the value of
> community media, and to allow us to take over some of the
> functions of local BBC, and to relax the restrictive practices
> that discourage entrepreneurship within our sector.
>
> CMA should
> consider employing outside expertise, and carefully chosen
> some of those could also provide funding. Advertising
> agencies, IT and equipment suppliers, joint licensing and many
> other options could be considered.
>
> We have the opportunity to create a real sense of national
> pride, to build local communities, to train and support local
> talent. We just need to be given a modicum of support.
>
> Such financing can arise through providing services. One
> significant example is that we should be the first suppliers
> to the Central Office of Information. We know we can provide
> services at a competitive price and we have a deeper reach
> into society than any other media.
>
> I believe we should use the BSkyB decision to further our aims
> and aspirations. A significant portion of the media is now in
> the hands of one Australian and his son. That helps my sense
> of national pride, but importantly offers us all an
> opportunity. We can provide local news, and we
> can supply real information about the mood of our people.
> Increasingly other media are separated from the people.
> Commercial radio agglomerates, newspapers and satellite
> stations are monopolistic.
>
> We are the only media in touch with real people.
>
> I'll repeat these are my opinions - not those of the Council.
>
> Trevor
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Reply - cma-l at commedia.org.uk <mailto:cma-l at commedia.org.uk>
>
> The cma-l mailing list is a members' service provided by the
> Community Media Association - http://www.commedia.org.uk
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/community_media
> http://www.facebook.com/CommunityMediaAssociation
> Canstream Internet Radio & Video: http://www.canstream.co.uk/
> _______________________________________________
>
> To unsubscribe or manage your CMA-L mailing list subscription
> please visit:
> http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l
>
>
>
>
> --
> GLOSS FM now broadcasting on 87.7FM across South Gloucestershire
> http://www.glossfm.org.
> Why not download the GLOSS FM browser toolbar for easy access to radio
> player, local information and more!
> http://GLOSSFM.Toolbar.fm/
>
--
please reply to
murray at shmu.org.uk
Murray Dawson
Project Director
Station House Media Unit
Station Road, Woodside,
Aberdeen AB24 2WB
Tel - 01224 515013
www.shmu.org.uk
listen to our community radio station live on 99.8FM and at www.shmufm.net
SHMU is a charity registered in Scotland - SC034211 and a registered Limited
Company - SC332413
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is not intended to have contractual effect
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/pipermail/cma-l/attachments/20110308/f9e16c8a/attachment.html>
More information about the cma-l
mailing list