[cma-l] cma-l Digest, Vol 77, Issue 38

Wed Sep 9 14:20:00 BST 2015

Well said Phil !

This really should not be getting nasty.

I have 3 DAB radios - had one since day 1 but sad to say I hardly ever listen on DAB due to the low quality and bad coverage.

If I want to listen to Solent, Wave, Heart or Radio 2 it's always on FM.

I support your view that DAB is not yet the best fit for rural community stations

Steve

 Company registration: 04937308
Telephone: Office 01202 820003  Studio 01202 820006
Website: www.forestfm.co.uk
Facebook: ForestFM Verwood
Twitter: @ForestFM

Listen to us online 24 hours a day via the Tunein app or via http://www.forestfm.co.uk/radioplayer/console/

-----Original Message-----
From: fantasy office <office at fantasyradio.co.uk>
To: cma-l <cma-l at mailman.commedia.org.uk>; james <james at cridland.net>
Sent: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:20
Subject: Re: [cma-l] cma-l Digest, Vol 77, Issue 38

Oh dear oh dear.

I really didn’t want to get into a conflict over this. As a radio bloke since 1974, I’m too long in the tooth to lock horns with anybody, especially you James. Respect! 

But I was there at the start of commercial radio in the UK as well as seeing the start of all things digital, and I had high hopes for DAB twenty years ago, but with the pathetic marketing, (in particular, the TV ads) confusing information and poor coverage and performance in many areas, as well as many DAB stations falling by the wayside, it really hasn’t really turned out all that well has it?

Thank you for pointing out the figures for me. DAB just over a quarter, as confirmed by David. That’s fine. As you say, facts is facts.

I understand the enthusiasm for DAB in some areas, but rural Wiltshire just ain’t London. (more Respect!) 

In my original post I said I was frustrated by the DAB issue and I’m afraid, James, your response has not helped. I’m certainly not anti digital, we use a lot of digital technology, for OBs, transmitter links, and we’ve been on line for years. I’m not even anti DAB – I just can’t see it working for us in Wiltshire. Like I said, London is different. 

You said ‘I'll never find you if you're on a tinpot FM transmitter at the top of a caravan, because I don't listen to FM. How many more people are there like me? Why do you bother broadcasting online?’

This is a bit much really. You clearly know nothing about us or our listeners…and why would we NOT go online?

I could have been offended by some of your comments, but I’m bigger than that. Perhaps you’d like to visit us and see how we do it here in the country?

Phil Dawson

FANTASY RADIO 97FM

Devizes,

Wiltshire

On 9/8/2015 11:40 PM,   cma-l-request at mailman.commedia.org.uk wrote:  

Send cma-l mailing list submissions to
	cma-l at mailman.commedia.org.uk

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	cma-l-request at mailman.commedia.org.uk

You can reach the person managing the list at
	cma-l-owner at mailman.commedia.org.uk

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cma-l digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re:  The DAB issue (James Cridland)
   2.  The DAB issue (fantasy office)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 21:26:50 +0000
From: James Cridland <james at cridland.net>
To: The Community Media Association Discussion List
	<cma-l at mailman.commedia.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [cma-l] The DAB issue
Message-ID:
	<CAGyDWza4rGqhTq0r4N8FUE3jJU4_Aoy0i5avO7tctDKT_qeedw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:10 PM fantasy office <office at fantasyradio.co.uk>
wrote:

And when Digital listening figures are quoted, DAB is always included with
all other forms of digital listening. No-one ever seems to give us the
ACTUAL DAB figures. And I mean LISTENING, not just DAB ownership.

Yeah, completely agree. How DARE the radio industry hide these figures away
from us?

http://go.muk.fm/oh-wait-here-they-are
<http://go.muk.fm/except-actually-they-dont> - for future reference, it's
on the RAJAR website, under 'listening figures - market trends'. The very
top, 'all radio listening', chart. It's IRRESPONSIBLE to hide the figures
away by publishing them as the top chart on the main radio listening
website and available to anyone.

More evidence that the radio industry is desperately trying to tell anyone
the ACTUAL DAB figures is the top line in the Digital Radio UK press
release:
https://media.info/radio/news/rajar-dab-growth-boosts-digital-listening-to-40 -
and I mean LISTENING as well as DAB ownership. It's a conspiracy in plain
sight. How dare they tell us these very figures?

Even digital listening as a whole hasn't yet reached 50% - which means
OVER 50% of listening is analogue.

In the London area, analogue listening is 45.9% - that's UNDER 50% - and
digital radio listening is 47.3%, which is MORE than analogue radio.
(There's "don't knows" to bear in mind, by the way). And if community radio
was in RAJAR, your figures would count, but since you're not, they don't.

And remember - DAB is over twenty years old now!

And remember - it took 43 years for FM listening to overtake AM listening
in the US! (So, DAB is growing faster than FM did. A stupid argument, but
facts is facts).

As far as cost to the broadcaster is concerned, DAB is completely
outpriced.

It's cheaper to broadcast a national radio station on DAB than it is on
analogue. But it is very expensive for smaller local broadcasters. Good job
there's work going on to fix that.

Why would we want to spend money on a local multiplex, either as an owner

Because you can rent out the space to other broadcasters and make money
from it.

or as a client? when our FM signal is very good.

Because you want people to listen? Just as many people never bother
flicking over to AM, households with DAB may never bother flicking over to
FM, and they'll never find you.

[FM] It's in Stereo and the audio quality is not compromised by reduced
bit rates.

The stereo-ness and audio quality of DAB is up to the broadcaster, it's not
a technology issue. Mono means a reduction of about 40% of the price of
stereo; and if you don't think stereo is worth 40% more, that's up to you.

As for any additional PRS or PPL, or even OFCOM costs for DAB

...you get a great deal on community radio music licences right now, and
there's no such thing as a community radio music licence for DAB. If you
believe you'd be better on a commercial radio music licence, that's
something for the CMA to take up with the relevant companies. And I believe
you pay extra for online streaming too?

I've asked the question before... Where does anyone think the money will
come from? We can't attract more listeners

...why not? I'll never find you if you're on a tinpot FM transmitter at the
top of a caravan, because I don't listen to FM. How many more people are
there like me? Why do you bother broadcasting online?

and even if we could, I doubt if our advertisers would be keen to pay
additional rates because we're on DAB.

Why should they pay additional rates for DAB? They pay on results, as any
advertiser does. If you have twice the amount of audience, you should
charge twice as much to advertisers.

I think the DAB thing, even with the fine efforts made by the technical
people within OFCOM is an unnecessary compication.

One that is used over four times as much as online streaming, which is
hardly complication-free.

We also do fine with digital broadcasting - online listening on computer,
ipad, smartphone. Stereo, reasonable bit rate, etc.

Yep, just like DAB, the bitrate and stereo is entirely up to you and your
budget. Unlike DAB, however, online radio listening costs you more money
per listener; doesn't have brilliant coverage either; is a fourth of the
size of DAB listening, and is growing slower than DAB listening.

Sorry this has turned into a rant, but quite clearly, we're in danger of
missing the point.

Sorry this has been a point by point rebuttal, but this type of incessant
whinging, false accusation and fantasy argument highlights how ridiculous
this argument is.

Your job is to make great, relevant content for your audience, and place
that content in a place where the audience want to consume it. That's all.

(And to think that the pro-DAB lobby accuse me of being anti-DAB!)

//j

My weekly 'future of radio' newsletter is less ranty:
http://james.cridland.net/

_______________________________________________

Reply -
cma-l at commedia.org.uk

The cma-l mailing list is a members' service provided
by the Community Media Association - http://www.commedia.org.uk
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/community_media
http://www.facebook.com/CommunityMediaAssociation
Canstream
Internet Radio & Video:
http://www.canstream.co.uk/
_______________________________________________

Mailing
list guidelines:
http://www.commedia.org.uk/about/cma-email-lists/email-list-guidelines/
_______________________________________________

To
unsubscribe or manage your CMA-L mailing list subscription please
visit:
http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/pipermail/cma-l/attachments/20150909/e0814d30/attachment.html>