[cma-l] Sony Radio Academy Awards 2011

Tue Apr 5 21:41:41 BST 2011

My sentiments entirely after spending £200 of my budget over the last 2 years and having nothing to show for it.

A

Andrew David
Managing Editor

SIREN FM - offering you the chance to be involved in the exciting world of community radio where you're only limited by your nerve and imagination - go on, be brave
www.sirenonline.co.uk <http://www.sirenonline.co.uk/> 
01522 886001

________________________________

From: cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk on behalf of Office - ccr-fm
Sent: Tue 05/04/2011 18:36
To: phil at radioregen.org; 'CMA-L'
Subject: Re: [cma-l] Sony Radio Academy Awards 2011

Not for us guys, we don't need awards. We know what we do, and we simply get on with it. If the mutual admiration society want to have their knees up every twelve months and then boast about it in their local rag, then that's fine by me ........................ we'll give it a miss I think.

We should have our own.

Nick

________________________________

From: cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk [mailto:cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk] On Behalf Of Phil Korbel
Sent: 05 April 2011 10:47
To: Ed Baxter
Cc: CMA-L
Subject: Re: [cma-l] Sony Radio Academy Awards 2011

Move over Will Self - Mr Baxter is in the building!  [that's a compliment BTW]

as someone who used to be a Sony judge [and an ex Committee member even] all I can say is that polish isn't necessary - authenticity and originality is - and generally stands out a mile...  Community radio doesn't need a team of fluffers to make our radio shine.  More to the point - do we really need awards?  We do need to celebrate our achievements better but really - how much of that is about "radio"?

I'm surprised that we didnt get more nominations - it might be worth asking how many community radio judges there are.  That said, in one year when an excellent community radio entry was in my category, the ILR and BBC judges needed little persuading to get it into the gong list...

bests

Phil

On 4 April 2011 12:43, Ed Baxter <ed at resonancefm.com> wrote:

Dear Joanne,
I somehow missed last year's debate, evidently.
I do not think there is very much expertise involved in entering; and
indeed I have heard some of the Big Guns' entries and not been
especially impressed. Insider knowledge is another matter and it is
hard not to view the nominations in the light of the kind of closed
shop or cosy club that characterises so many industry jamborees. The
politics of the Awards is always curious to observe, if not exactly
edifying. The occasional bone is thrown from the high table, for
certain. But I am not sure what it has to do with radio as I
understand the meaning of the word. Good grief, how utterly tedious
and arse-numbingly dull it all is! I nearly wept with boredom as I
scanned this year's nominations. Only a dentist would find anything to
celebrate on the awards' website.

I sat through the ceremony last year in a stone-cold sober stupor of
glassy-eyed indifference, baffled by the in-jokes, depressed by Chris
Evans's hyper-kinetic banter, and ruminating on the fact that while I
had stood outside the hotel Evan Davies had portentously cycled past
on his way home, smirking, evidently too savvy to turn up for the
"Today" programmes's award. Of course the closed shop, if that is what
is it, is that of Luvviedom: this is a showbiz event for showbiz
people. Hoi polloi should understand that and the clue lies in the two
hundred pounds it costs to get into the ceremony, let alone the amount
it costs to enter the competition. I tried of course to down two
hundred quids worth of booze during the ceremony, but it was
physically impossible given the quality of the wine. And I searched
the toilets in vain for signs of discarded cocaine, again to no
effect. Hard times!
But I did at least have a decent chat with a Mongolian waiter whose
lack of knowledge in the feted broadcasters was eclipsed only by my
own lack of engagement. The highlight for me was the award given to
Bono for his radio-art portrait of Elvis Presley, which met with near
universal indifference and even hostility on the part of some of the
guests. As usual, I found myself in a minority of one in thinking it
was actually deserved and that millionaire rock stars should try their
hand at something new. It was surely well-made and heartfelt, which
alone distinguished it. Hilariously, the broadcasters and their teams
evidently mostly believed that they were somehow cooler and hipper
than the terminally uncool and unhip Bono. Nothing could have been
further from the truth. The same people will be cheering on Ronnie
Wood this year, sure as night follows day.
Jarvis Cocker was greeted as if the Queen Mother had risen from the
dead and one longed for a doppelganger to get on stage to bear his bum
at the new, my-people-deserve-me Jarvis. David Attenborough was
applauded as though he could turn water into wine - or even transform
the Chateau Enver Hoxha with which the tables were set into something
drinkable. And Jenny Murray did what I insensibly mistook to be a Lady
Macbeth routine, which set a thunderous tone of moral outrage that
subsequent winners each tried feebly to emulate. But knowing
self-congratulation was the overwhelming order of the day and if you
had not actually heard of, worked with, or gone to school with
Chris-this or Zane-that, it was because your natural place in the
world was surely with the waiters and waitresses in the no man's land
of cultural disenfranchisement.
My companion, a fine artist used to the steamy solipsism of such
industrial feeding frenzies, observed that it could just as easily
have been an aluminium sales convention. Oh, how we laughed and
crammed breadsticks into our mouths.
I staggered onto the bendy bus reeling from my failure to beat whoever
it as who had won the award I was up for. Back home, I hit the bottle
of Buckfast I'd been keeping for special celebrations, downing it in
one savage gulp; furiously, I swept the candles from in front of my
little shrine to "Peely" off the kitchen table as the tears streamed
down my now tattered tuxedo; and with a hollow bark of contempt I
hurled my copy of PB Randolph's "Sex Magick" manual into the bin as a
worthless distraction from reality. As I tossed and turned in my
dreams that night, Jarvis, Jenny and the rest rose above me, forming a
minor celebrity caravan of disdainful radiophonic phantoms, their
faces looming in hideous close-up, their voices reworked as  if by
Delia Derbyshire herself into a symphony of sneering superiority.
"Sour grapes! Sour grapes!" they cackled, each poking at me,
carressing me with corpselike fingers. And I awoke in struggles and
cried, " I will sleep no more!"

This year I am mercifully spared all the suffering as none of the five
programmes Resonance entered even made the short list.

Yours
Ed Baxter

PS caveat: none of the opinions and views expressed in this email
represent or are intended to represent the opinions or views of
Resonance FM, but are merely and solely those of the author.

_______________________________________________

Reply - cma-l at commedia.org.uk

The cma-l mailing list is a members' service provided by the Community Media Association - http://www.commedia.org.uk <http://www.commedia.org.uk/> 
Twitter: http://twitter.com/community_media
http://www.facebook.com/CommunityMediaAssociation
Canstream Internet Radio & Video: http://www.canstream.co.uk/
_______________________________________________

Mailing list guidelines: http://www.commedia.org.uk/about/cma-email-lists/email-list-guidelines/
_______________________________________________

To unsubscribe or manage your CMA-L mailing list subscription please visit:
http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l

-- 
Phil Korbel
Director
0161 237 5454

Radio Regen is a community, media and urban regeneration charity 
A company limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales No. 3753832 
Registered office: 12 Hilton Street, Manchester, M1 1JF 
Registered Charity No. 1077763 
www.radioregen.org <http://www.radioregen.org/> 
www.communityradiotoolkit.net <http://www.communityradiotoolkit.net/> 

The information in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender immediately and remove it from your system. Do not disclose the contents to another person or take copies.

Email is not secure and may contain viruses. The University of Lincoln makes every effort to ensure email is sent without viruses, but cannot guarantee this and recommends recipients take appropriate precautions.

The University may monitor email traffic data and content in accordance with its policies and English law. Further information can be found at: http://www.lincoln.ac.uk/legal.