<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
</head><body style="">
<div>
PPL has never been noted for adopting rational or fair policies towards small stations. Why would they suddenly start now when another excuse to shaft us presents itself?!
</div>
<div>
 
</div>
<div>
PRS has always had notably fairer and more sensible arrangements in my experience.
</div>
<div>
 
</div>
<div>
Alex
</div>
<blockquote style="position: relative; margin-left: 0px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 1px blue;" type="cite">
On 11 March 2015 at 18:49 Geoff Rogers <geoff@susyradio.com> wrote:
<br />
<br />
<div dir="ltr">
All the costs seem reasonable apart from the greed shown by PPL insisting on a separate fee for simulcasting on DAB. It's unbelievable and I cannot see any justification for it, can they prove any loss to revenue by being aired on a trial DAB service?? I give huge credit to PRS for being realistic and encouraging these trials by waiving any extra fee as they no doubt see that there is absolutely no justification for it.
<div>
 
</div>
<div>
I think we should shout 'unfair' loudly and refuse to take part in the trial if we are to be subjected to this blatantly unfair and extra burden on what after all is supposed to be a trial for everyone's benefit.
</div>
<div>
 
</div>
<div>
We should take a stand !
</div>
<div>
 
</div>
<div>
I'll stop ranting now.
</div>
<div>
 
</div>
<div>
Kind regards to all
</div>
<div>
 
</div>
<div>
Geoff
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
 
</div>
</body></html>