<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>I agree wholeheart<span style="font-size: 12pt;">edly with Alan's point about the STL situation, and also JC's about the visual image of the station as seem by visitors and potential Clients.</span><div>Links are a whole separate ball-game from RF propagation - and each format has its advantages and drawbacks.</div><div>RF or IT?</div><div>Line-of-sight definite/possible/occluded/impossible?</div><div>Wholly-owned - or dependent on operating through commercial facilities?<br>Licensed for protection - or licence-free for cost saving?</div><div>Analogue with no delay for off-air monitoring or digital with latency?</div><div>As for what offices and studios look like - we see all sorts in our travels.<br>Some CRs I could mention would make a commercial station jealous.</div><div>Others have you wondering how they ever get anything to work at all - let alone reliably.</div><div>But my original point was to do with the vital planning stage well before an air date.</div><div>If only we could pass on valuable experience in time to make changes!<br><div><br><div><hr id="stopSpelling"><br></div></div></div> </div></body>
</html>