<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hello Ian,<br>
      <br>
      Briefly, protection ratios: Italy has in the past been fairly
      unregulated let us say, however, they do appear to have a very
      large number of stations on band 2.&nbsp; So far as I can tell from the
      available info, there are some city sites at high power with what
      looks like around 40+ db co-channel protection (which broadly
      seems to comply with ITU-R BS 412-9) with a much larger number at
      low power sharing the channel at greater distances.&nbsp; Question:
      What rule has been revised here?&nbsp; CR sub band:&nbsp; Have a look at
      87.7 I think they are all long term RSLs. This is in effect a CR
      sub-band already.<br>
      <br>
      Regards,&nbsp; Tony Bailey<br>
      <br>
      On 25/09/14 12:51, Ian Hickling wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:DUB125-W432271D781B71FDFB8A009ADBE0@phx.gbl"
      type="cite">
      <style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style>
      <div dir="ltr">To me the problem is very simple - the archaic
        rules that govern potential interference on VHF/FM services need
        to be revised.
        <div>CR will not get - and doesn't need - its own Band II
          sector.</div>
        <div>There are 204 channels available virtually everywhere -
          there is plenty of room for everyone.</div>
        <div>Italy as one case alone has proved this.<br>
          <br>
          <div>
            <hr id="stopSpelling">Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:43:17 +0100<br>
            From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ravensound@pilgrimsound.co.uk">ravensound@pilgrimsound.co.uk</a><br>
            To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cma-l@mailman.commedia.org.uk">cma-l@mailman.commedia.org.uk</a><br>
            Subject: Re: [cma-l] Community Radio on AM<br>
            <br>
            <div class="ecxmoz-cite-prefix">From an AM perspective, the
              old steam radio has been there and done most of this -
              sharing channels, synchronised oscillators - jamming -
              offset carriers you name it, all to try to overcome the
              limitations of the spectrum.&nbsp; If you have super expensive
              receivers it helps, the problem with that is we
              increasingly don't have that option.&nbsp; At least with a
              ferrite rod antenna you could null out (even jamming) the
              unwanted station.&nbsp; There is also the strategic need to
              limit competition - once again AM has been there: it was
              strongly argued for years that there was no room on the
              medium wave band for commercial radio!<br>
              <br>
              I don't believe you will get anywhere with this until the
              community has it's own slice of the cake in band 2 (as do
              the BBC and ILR in principle).&nbsp; It has long been accepted
              that low power radio should have a separate allocation.&nbsp;
              As I understand it, there are now ways to reduce the 2.2
              MHz national network slot, doing this with all five would
              release two chunks for CR.&nbsp; Surely there is an argument
              that if the nationals are not going to move to DAB yet,
              they are squatters?<br>
              <br>
              Regards,&nbsp; Tony Bailey<br>
              <br>
              On 25/09/14 08:23, Ian Hickling wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote
              cite="mid:DUB125-W1221A860A80EE066F246D3ADBE0@phx.gbl">
              <style><!--
.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P {
padding:0px;
}

.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage {
font-size:12pt;
font-family:Calibri;
}

--></style>
              <div dir="ltr">I don't agree that ".....proper
                computerised tools are needed to do it properly" Glyn -
                sorry.
                <div>Computerised tools have got us into the farce that
                  we are currently in.</div>
                <div>Certainly we need proper planning - but after that
                  we need practical onsite trials as you say with
                  measurement and analysis.</div>
                <div>This however is costly in terms of the equipment
                  and manpower which Ofcom does not have available and
                  is not going to get funded by HMG.</div>
                <div>So Ofcom <b>could</b> do it but won't.<br>
                  Lots of us <b>can</b> do it - but Ofcom doesn't
                  accept that concept.<br>
                  <br>
                  <div>
                    <hr id="ecxstopSpelling">From: <a
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="ecxmoz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                      href="mailto:tlr@gairloch.co.uk">tlr@gairloch.co.uk</a><br>
                    To: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="ecxmoz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                      href="mailto:info@a-bc.co.uk">info@a-bc.co.uk</a><br>
                    Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:11:01 +0100<br>
                    CC: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="ecxmoz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                      href="mailto:cma-l@mailman.commedia.org.uk">cma-l@mailman.commedia.org.uk</a><br>
                    Subject: Re: [cma-l] Community Radio on AM<br>
                    <br>
                    <style><!--

--></style>
                    <div><font face="Calibri" size="2">I understand the
                        'complex scientific' side of it, but I still
                        don't honestly see how the map helps give any
                        insight other than in the crudest measure of
                        overall density of stations.&nbsp;</font></div>
                    <div>&nbsp;</div>
                    <div><font face="Calibri" size="2">It shows the
                        general density of stations and is a nice tool
                        for browsing stations and frequencies, but it
                        gives no visual representation whatever of
                        frequencies or powers, so I don't honestly see
                        how it gives even the vaguest insight into the
                        interference landscape for a station.</font></div>
                    <div>&nbsp;</div>
                    <div><font face="Calibri" size="2">It could maybe
                        take&nbsp;useful&nbsp;steps in that direction with some
                        development. For example if one could select a
                        frequency or transmitter of interest and set a
                        filter to show only stations of that frequency,
                        or of that frequency plus adjacent and/or image
                        channels it would start to give an idea of
                        potential for interference. Combined with
                        perhaps a crude free space range
                        indication&nbsp;using semi-transparent overlays based
                        on on powers and direction templayes it might
                        beging to give a rough feel for the interference
                        landscape for a given station. But as it stands
                        I don't see how it does that in the slightest.</font></div>
                    <div>&nbsp;</div>
                    <div><font face="Calibri" size="2">Not meaning to be
                        picky, honest&nbsp;- I like it for what it is, and it
                        does give a feel for the geographic distribution
                        of CR stations, but it doesn't seem to me
                        to&nbsp;offer any useful insight or even vague feel
                        for the interference landscape.</font></div>
                    <div><font face="Calibri" size="2"><br>
                        Alex</font></div>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________
            Reply - <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cma-l@commedia.org.uk">cma-l@commedia.org.uk</a>
            The cma-l mailing list is a members' service provided by the
            Community Media Association - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.commedia.org.uk">http://www.commedia.org.uk</a>
            Twitter: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://twitter.com/community_media">http://twitter.com/community_media</a>
            <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.facebook.com/CommunityMediaAssociation">http://www.facebook.com/CommunityMediaAssociation</a>
            Canstream Internet Radio &amp; Video:
            <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.canstream.co.uk/">http://www.canstream.co.uk/</a>
            _______________________________________________
            Mailing list guidelines:
            <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.commedia.org.uk/about/cma-email-lists/email-list-guidelines/">http://www.commedia.org.uk/about/cma-email-lists/email-list-guidelines/</a>
            _______________________________________________
            To unsubscribe or manage your CMA-L mailing list
            subscription please visit:
            <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l">http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l</a></div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________

Reply - <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cma-l@commedia.org.uk">cma-l@commedia.org.uk</a>

The cma-l mailing list is a members' service provided by the Community Media Association - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.commedia.org.uk">http://www.commedia.org.uk</a>
Twitter: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://twitter.com/community_media">http://twitter.com/community_media</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.facebook.com/CommunityMediaAssociation">http://www.facebook.com/CommunityMediaAssociation</a>
Canstream Internet Radio &amp; Video: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.canstream.co.uk/">http://www.canstream.co.uk/</a>
_______________________________________________

Mailing list guidelines: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.commedia.org.uk/about/cma-email-lists/email-list-guidelines/">http://www.commedia.org.uk/about/cma-email-lists/email-list-guidelines/</a>
_______________________________________________

To unsubscribe or manage your CMA-L mailing list subscription please visit:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l">http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>