<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<BR>
Peter<BR>
I'm sorry if I appear to have been rude about "Academics"!<BR>
You have a good point there that I would positively support.<BR>
There appears to be no central reference point for, or organisation of, funding for Community Media - and certainly not for Radio.<BR>
Some CR operators in some areas seem to have got the bit between their teeth, but most are struggling - some even floundering.<BR>
There also needs to be some positive guidance as to how to balance off funding and advertising/sponsorship and how to get the best out of the "get-out clauses" that exist.<BR>
That together with contined lobbying of the Goverment for relaxation of Ofcom's rules on the structuring of commercial revenues.<BR>
Ian Hickling<BR>
Partner<BR>
transplan UK<BR>
<BR> <BR>> Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 09:36:31 +0100<BR>> From: p.lewis@londonmet.ac.uk<BR>> To: marilyn@northernvisions.org<BR>> CC: cma-l@commedia.org.uk<BR>> Subject: Re: [cma-l] Frustrated campaigning<BR>> <BR>> Dear all<BR>> <BR>> The 'Sunday discussion' connects with an idea that I've been mulling <BR>> over. I should explain that I am an 'academic' as well as having been a <BR>> member of the CMA for years - and before that a founding member of its <BR>> predecessor the Community Communications Group at a time when I was a <BR>> practitioner (community TV). There are not many of us in the media <BR>> studies departments of colleges and universities who are interested in <BR>> community media, but, Mark Polden, we could play a part in helping <BR>> getting community media properly recognised and funded.<BR>> <BR>> That's because our job includes research - something you guys have <BR>> little time to do - and research can cover a multitude of activities. A <BR>> great job is being done in Sheffield collecting info about funding <BR>> sources. I would like to combine this with a mapping exercise which <BR>> helps us (CMA members) see what the the needs and opportunities <BR>> (political, funding) are in different regions.<BR>> <BR>> I hope to talk to Jaqui about this soon. Meanwhile what do you think?<BR>> <BR>> Peter M. Lewis<BR>> Senior Lecturer in Community Media<BR>> Department of Applied Social Sciences<BR>> London Metropolitan University<BR>> Ladbroke House<BR>> 62-66 Highbury Grove<BR>> London N5 2AD<BR>> <BR>> http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/depts/dass/staff/peterlewis/<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Marilyn Hyndman wrote:<BR>> > Someone probably needs to do a mapping exercise across UK, I am sure <BR>> > there are all sorts of anomalies re decentralised government, maybe look <BR>> > at the organisations it is crucial to lobby and pin point where they are <BR>> > on regional basis? We are only using Arts Council as an example... Film <BR>> > Lottery, isn't that more centralised through Film Council, we have <BR>> > different economic development boards here to what is in England too? I <BR>> > can't really answer this one as I don't know enough about the <BR>> > infrastructure in England.<BR>> > <BR>> > Yes, we do need to look at networking for local television but there may <BR>> > be a case for local radio as well... do community radio stations want to <BR>> > share some programming on a network basis? Decent funds could make this <BR>> > a possibility? What could that programming be? Ad hoc basis for radio a <BR>> > result of struggling to survive? What do the radio folks think?<BR>> > <BR>> > All the best,<BR>> > Marilyn<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > On 16 May 2010, at 17:50, Dave Rushton wrote:<BR>> > <BR>> >> Hi Phil<BR>> >><BR>> >> Yes to sectoral identity - but you reminding radio folk its 'community <BR>> >> media' not just 'community radio' (changed in 1996 I think) misses the <BR>> >> structural difference of approach as well as thinking: radio has <BR>> >> adopted an ad hoc approach whereas fTV seeks a universal network <BR>> >> solution. <BR>> >><BR>> >> For TV too the Ofcom PSB agenda beyond London has now become 'nations, <BR>> >> regions and localities' - and localities includes print as well as <BR>> >> Internet - the new collectivism is local public service/purpose media.<BR>> >><BR>> >> I recall a very short-lived attempt to include community print with TV <BR>> >> when 'media' emerged to replace 'radio'. Somehow the Internet was <BR>> >> bundled into media without much thought (It appealed to some <BR>> >> technophiles in CMA) - but micro-newspapers, why are they not included?<BR>> >><BR>> >> Also its not just a need to address in terms of a devolved Arts <BR>> >> Council scale - but to be at forefront of de-centralisaed government <BR>> >> and regulation - subsidiarity as well as devolution for local and <BR>> >> community media.<BR>> >><BR>> >> Best<BR>> >><BR>> >> Dave<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> On 16 May 2010, at 13:38, Phil Shep wrote:<BR>> >><BR>> >>> Dear Marilyn<BR>> >>><BR>> >>> Your input is always so on the money for me, I wish there were more <BR>> >>> opportunities to thrash all this stuff out. A pro active approach <BR>> >>> where we bring the funders to the strength of our idea rather than <BR>> >>> waiting for the next twist in the policy road would be great. And yes <BR>> >>> let's look at how we follow things up, mobilise support when the <BR>> >>> issues and opportunities arise, there is a tie in to regional <BR>> >>> structure there, once we know when and where the agm is - the detail <BR>> >>> of which is itself contingent on available resources - let's support <BR>> >>> Jaqui in creating an agenda which really gets to the nub of this ( <BR>> >>> not that Jaqui won't anyway be doing just that!) and set a course for <BR>> >>> future which everyone can get behind and contribute to...<BR>> >>><BR>> >>> Best wishes<BR>> >>><BR>> >>> Phil <BR>> >>><BR>> >>><BR>> >>><BR>> >>> On 16 May 2010, at 13:14, Marilyn Hyndman <BR>> >>> <marilyn@northernvisions.org <mailto:marilyn@northernvisions.org>> wrote:<BR>> >>><BR>> >>>> Hi Phil,<BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> Not suggesting that nothing is being done.. I have also been to <BR>> >>>> meetings and been promised that various things will be considered, I <BR>> >>>> guess many of us have, I understand how frustrating all of this is <BR>> >>>> and I know it often comes down to a few groups/individuals in a <BR>> >>>> sector to keep the torch alight, more is the pity.<BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> .....what I am trying to get at is how to make this process better. <BR>> >>>> For example, with Lottery, should there not have been an immediate <BR>> >>>> protest by the sector ... maybe there was an equality issue here, <BR>> >>>> other forms of activity/sectors are recognised... first I have heard <BR>> >>>> of all of this, always thought nothing had been done, perhaps that <BR>> >>>> is my fault and I didn't read the emails. <BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> So, process ... how is everything followed up, should there be an <BR>> >>>> automatic call on the sector, a rallying of the troops once a <BR>> >>>> decision has been made by some quango we are all beholden to? <BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> Not sure about these bids like EQUAL either, always contorting to <BR>> >>>> someone else's misconceived view of the world. Should we not be <BR>> >>>> pro-active and propose our own large scale project and then look for <BR>> >>>> a cocktail of funders? Perhaps that is where your regional idea can <BR>> >>>> come in? <BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> But nothing less than several £million as a target.....?<BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> All the best,<BR>> >>>> Marilyn<BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> On 16 May 2010, at 12:55, Phil Shep wrote:<BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>>> Hi Marilyn<BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>> We did approach Lottery about three years ago arguing for a <BR>> >>>>> dedicated funding stream for community media. I met the head of Big <BR>> >>>>> lottery to that effect and was promised that it would be considered <BR>> >>>>> in what is now their recent review. Nothing came of that. All these <BR>> >>>>> initiatives - as we know from the local TV campaign - require <BR>> >>>>> concerted and long term input to stand any chance of success. <BR>> >>>>> Digital switchover is another and again it's not that nothing's <BR>> >>>>> being done, but arguably as much as is feasible with limited capacity. <BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>> How to increase capacity? It's argued by some that CMA should focus <BR>> >>>>> more on large scale funding bids like Equal of old. They are of <BR>> >>>>> course very time consuming and success uncertain at best. We do <BR>> >>>>> have several financial irons in the fire right now which if <BR>> >>>>> succesful wll free up time to add strength to the policy arguments <BR>> >>>>> we are making. Yes community media does need to become recognised <BR>> >>>>> as a legitimate sector in it's own right and from my experience bit <BR>> >>>>> by bit that is becoming the case. It's nowhere near fast enough, <BR>> >>>>> it's not teanslating into pund notes and progress is patchy. <BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>> Incidentally and to answer another point raised in the list today <BR>> >>>>> academic support is critical to that profile raising - vital to <BR>> >>>>> being taken seriously in the wider world. We welcome that input to <BR>> >>>>> Council.<BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>> Best wishes<BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>> Phil <BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>> <BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>> I <BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>> On 16 May 2010, at 12:25, Marilyn Hyndman < <BR>> >>>>> <mailto:marilyn@northernvisions.org>marilyn@northernvisions.org <BR>> >>>>> <mailto:marilyn@northernvisions.org>> wrote:<BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>>> Hi Phil,<BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>> Perhaps it might be easier to gauge if there was a breakdown of <BR>> >>>>>> what is happening in each 'region' already. <BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>> I can see how strategic alliances could be formed to lobby <BR>> >>>>>> regional bodies, arts councils, screen commissions, economic <BR>> >>>>>> development bodies etc, those bodies that have a regional or <BR>> >>>>>> nation set up but there are hidden dangers in this because what <BR>> >>>>>> you really need is a national (UK) recognition of the importance <BR>> >>>>>> of community media... these bodies all have differing policies and <BR>> >>>>>> criteria already, none of this is uniform when it comes to <BR>> >>>>>> community media and quite a lot of times community media does not <BR>> >>>>>> figure in any of this, and/or is not understood very well. <BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>> Does community media not need to be accepted as an 'activity', <BR>> >>>>>> 'sector' call it what you will, the same way independent film or <BR>> >>>>>> literature or drama or even community development is and with a <BR>> >>>>>> funding stream, preferably a dedicated funding stream. <BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>> One area we have plugged for a long time is Lottery but no one in <BR>> >>>>>> CMA has thought it important to take up. A unified policy and <BR>> >>>>>> criteria with Lottery for community media as a good cause would <BR>> >>>>>> help, similarly with Skillset, Arts Councils, economic development <BR>> >>>>>> boards ... though easier if this was agreed with DCMS and filtered <BR>> >>>>>> down to these bodies as a directive rather than a massive <BR>> >>>>>> undertaking by a sector lobbying in their own areas and already <BR>> >>>>>> under pressure?<BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>> The other area is the Digital Switchover fund ... again surely <BR>> >>>>>> best done on a UK basis? Where is the strategy on this, does this <BR>> >>>>>> not need to be sorted pretty sharply?<BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>> All the best,<BR>> >>>>>> Marilyn<BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>> <BR>> >>>>>> On 16 May 2010, at 12:02, Phil Shep wrote:<BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>> Hi Marilyn<BR>> >>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>> I take your point and like the idea of communitiesof interest. I <BR>> >>>>>>> think the regional thing I'd important too though -when regional <BR>> >>>>>>> events have occasionally taken place they have always proved <BR>> >>>>>>> valuable - asides and information exchanges, as sources of <BR>> >>>>>>> inspiration for the embattled - inculcating a sense of engagement <BR>> >>>>>>> and ownership which us important in a membership organisation. I <BR>> >>>>>>> think this feeds back to the centre too, active support on the <BR>> >>>>>>> ground manifesting for example through joined up approaches to <BR>> >>>>>>> MPs surgeries etc. It's about the local agenda too, not just <BR>> >>>>>>> because our new gov tkd about it but because it has to be the <BR>> >>>>>>> future surely.<BR>> >>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>> It's not an either / or - communities of interest would certainly <BR>> >>>>>>> be good.<BR>> >>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>> Phil <BR>> >>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>> On 16 May 2010, at 11:02, Marilyn Hyndman < <BR>> >>>>>>> <mailto:marilyn@northernvisions.org> <BR>> >>>>>>> <mailto:marilyn@northernvisions.org>marilyn@northernvisions.org <BR>> >>>>>>> <mailto:marilyn@northernvisions.org>> wrote:<BR>> >>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>> Whilst regional and local strategy is important, the CMA is a UK <BR>> >>>>>>>> organisation and is it not the strategic development between <BR>> >>>>>>>> government and organisations nationally which has stalled and <BR>> >>>>>>>> caused so much frustration? <BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>> Would it not be better for us all to understand why that is and <BR>> >>>>>>>> if anything could be done better ..... before going off in other <BR>> >>>>>>>> directions which may lead us up blind alleys? <BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>> For example, how do regional strategies key into the big picture <BR>> >>>>>>>> if the big picture is not understood or is failing? <BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>> All you would be doing in that scenario is adding another layer <BR>> >>>>>>>> of frustration as the centre fails to deliver with far more <BR>> >>>>>>>> chance that the sector will fracture? <BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>> I wonder if it would not be better to have communities of <BR>> >>>>>>>> interest rather than a regional structure which given the nature <BR>> >>>>>>>> of the sector will surely be very uneven across the country. <BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>> Groupings which take up issues important for the whole UK sector <BR>> >>>>>>>> and put their energies into that?<BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>> M<BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>> On 15 May 2010, at 09:51, Phil Shep wrote:<BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> Dear all<BR>> >>>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> There has long been a need for more joined up regional <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> working within CMA and this fact has not been lost on staff <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> and council. Our great frustration in recent years has been a <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> lack of capacity to do more to make this happen on the <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> ground. Jaqui and the team go well beyond the call of duty on <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> a daily basis to hold the line for the sector, to make sure <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> we are represented at the key conversations, to provide the <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> tech and information support which is so useful to us all. <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> But holding the line is necessarily where we have been at for <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> quite a while and as a sector we need to look at how we can <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> work more effectively together to addresss this - and for me <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> the key is in regional working.<BR>> >>>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> Again, capacity rears its head - yes we're all busy - but <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> also at times we are short-sighted when we build alliances <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> with others and fail to key in our collective strength to the <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> bigger picture .<BR>> >>>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> As has been observed, there is too often a disconnect between <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> the passionate ideas expressed and the ability of the tiny <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> over- stretched core to follow up the ideas - the ones <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> couched in reality at least! If we were meeting regularly at <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> a regional level we could do much more to mobilise grass <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> roots campaigning.<BR>> >>>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> Just here in Somerset we have at least six CR stations and <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> other CM projects within a fifty mile radius and while there <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> is at times I know, good and positive communication flowing <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> between projects this rarely translates into joined up <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> campaigns which key into the bigger picture. Let's really <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> tackle this one at the AGM this year - it's overdue and would <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think obviate some of the frustrations expressed recently <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> on this list. I've got a year left at most as Chair and <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> would like to to do as much as possible in that time to put <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> the beginnings of a working regional structure in place. <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> Let me know what you think.<BR>> >>>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> And yes to echo others, if you've got time and energy to <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> give,please do consider standing for council. We need all <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> the expertise and energy we can muster to help take us all <BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> forward.<BR>> >>>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes<BR>> >>>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> Phil<BR>> >>>>>>>>>>> Chair of Council<BR>> >>>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________<BR>> >>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>> cma-l mailing list - <mailto:cma-l@commedia.org.uk> <BR>> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:cma-l@commedia.org.uk> <BR>> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:cma-l@commedia.org.uk>cma-l@commedia.org.uk <BR>> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:cma-l@commedia.org.uk><BR>> >>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>> Community Media Association - <http://www.commedia.org.uk> <BR>> >>>>>>>>> <http://www.commedia.org.uk> <BR>> >>>>>>>>> <http://www.commedia.org.uk>www.commedia.org.uk <BR>> >>>>>>>>> <http://www.commedia.org.uk><BR>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________<BR>> >>>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>>> To manage your mailing list subscription please visit:<BR>> >>>>>>>>> <http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l> <BR>> >>>>>>>>> <http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l> <BR>> >>>>>>>>> <http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l>http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l<BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>> Marilyn Hyndman<BR>> >>>>>>>> Northern Visions/NvTv<BR>> >>>>>>>> 23 Donegall Street<BR>> >>>>>>>> Belfast<BR>> >>>>>>>> BT1 2FF<BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>> Tel: 028 9024 5495 ext 207<BR>> >>>>>>>> Fax: 028 9032 6608<BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>> NvTv <BR>> >>>>>>>> Belfast Community Television<BR>> >>>>>>>> Free-to-Air on Channel 62/Freq:799.276MHz<BR>> >>>>>>>> Live on line: <http://www.nvtv.co.uk> <http://www.nvtv.co.uk> <BR>> >>>>>>>> <http://www.nvtv.co.uk>www.nvtv.co.uk <http://www.nvtv.co.uk><BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>> <http://www.northernvisions.org> <BR>> >>>>>>>> <http://www.northernvisions.org> <BR>> >>>>>>>> <http://www.northernvisions.org>www.northernvisions.org <BR>> >>>>>>>> <http://www.northernvisions.org><BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>>><BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>> Marilyn Hyndman<BR>> >>>>>> Northern Visions/NvTv<BR>> >>>>>> 23 Donegall Street<BR>> >>>>>> Belfast<BR>> >>>>>> BT1 2FF<BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>> Tel: 028 9024 5495 ext 207<BR>> >>>>>> Fax: 028 9032 6608<BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>> NvTv <BR>> >>>>>> Belfast Community Television<BR>> >>>>>> Free-to-Air on Channel 62/Freq:799.276MHz<BR>> >>>>>> Live on line: <http://www.nvtv.co.uk> <BR>> >>>>>> <http://www.nvtv.co.uk>www.nvtv.co.uk <http://www.nvtv.co.uk><BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>> <http://www.northernvisions.org> <BR>> >>>>>> <http://www.northernvisions.org>www.northernvisions.org <BR>> >>>>>> <http://www.northernvisions.org><BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>>><BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> Marilyn Hyndman<BR>> >>>> Northern Visions/NvTv<BR>> >>>> 23 Donegall Street<BR>> >>>> Belfast<BR>> >>>> BT1 2FF<BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> Tel: 028 9024 5495 ext 207<BR>> >>>> Fax: 028 9032 6608<BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> NvTv <BR>> >>>> Belfast Community Television<BR>> >>>> Free-to-Air on Channel 62/Freq:799.276MHz<BR>> >>>> Live on line: <http://www.nvtv.co.uk>www.nvtv.co.uk <BR>> >>>> <http://www.nvtv.co.uk><BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> <http://www.northernvisions.org>www.northernvisions.org <BR>> >>>> <http://www.northernvisions.org><BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>><BR>> >>><BR>> >>><BR>> >>> _______________________________________________<BR>> >>><BR>> >>> cma-l mailing list - cma-l@commedia.org.uk <mailto:cma-l@commedia.org.uk><BR>> >>><BR>> >>> Community Media Association - www.commedia.org.uk <BR>> >>> <http://www.commedia.org.uk><BR>> >>> _______________________________________________<BR>> >>><BR>> >>> To manage your mailing list subscription please visit:<BR>> >>> http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l<BR>> >><BR>> > <BR>> > Marilyn Hyndman<BR>> > Northern Visions/NvTv<BR>> > 23 Donegall Street<BR>> > Belfast<BR>> > BT1 2FF<BR>> > <BR>> > Tel: 028 9024 5495 ext 207<BR>> > Fax: 028 9032 6608<BR>> > <BR>> > NvTv <BR>> > Belfast Community Television<BR>> > Free-to-Air on Channel 62/Freq:799.276MHz<BR>> > Live on line: www.nvtv.co.uk <http://www.nvtv.co.uk><BR>> > <BR>> > www.northernvisions.org <http://www.northernvisions.org><BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>> > <BR>> > _______________________________________________<BR>> > <BR>> > cma-l mailing list - cma-l@commedia.org.uk<BR>> > <BR>> > Community Media Association - www.commedia.org.uk<BR>> > _______________________________________________<BR>> > <BR>> > To manage your mailing list subscription please visit:<BR>> > http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Companies Act 2006 : http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/companyinfo<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> <BR>> cma-l mailing list - cma-l@commedia.org.uk<BR>> <BR>> Community Media Association - www.commedia.org.uk<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> <BR>> To manage your mailing list subscription please visit:<BR>> http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l<BR> </body>
</html>