[cma-l] Review of the approach to community radioKey Commitments

Fri Oct 16 12:47:47 BST 2015

Richard et al

I have submitted the 'rant' as some in our fraternity will of course call it
(I think not)   all I am is merely a person who is sick to death of going
around in a circle for 9 long years arguing and debating the same old
debacle on a ground hog day basis. Commercial Radio influencing decisions
and poking their conks into a project that has NOTHING at all to do with
them. I don't interfere with them but they have influence on what we do.
They seem to be able to have power boosts, change programming and key
commitments at the drop of a hat and yet we're trying to work in a straight
jacket and jump through hoops with only a quarter of the resources.

I'll tell you the biggest restriction we all/each have     A 25 WATT
TRANSMITTER !        we don't need anymore restrictions, that alone is
enough. We're trying to provide a service to people and for people who can't
hear us ???   and then they put restrictions on us           who thought
that one up ?  a madman !?? 

I try when possible to ad a bit of humour into the situation because if we
didn't laugh we'd go bonkers. Some would argue I already have      LOL    

For the record, the submission was made clearly saying that I don't care who
reads it. I have long gone past all of that /confidentiality nonsense'
what you see is what you get, like it or lump it. Too much pussy-footying
around, being walked all over, we need to stand up and be counted with a bit
more thrust and determination. Remember that most of the comments coming
back having a pop at me are from the ''I'm alright Jack brigade''

Under the confidentiality section I have written   ''announce it to the
World''     my name is on it, so we don't have Mr Anon or Mrs pseudonym
facebook or Mr AKA Twitter ...stand up and be counted.

I notice others on the message board who also place posts that are quite
forthright, I know quite a few of these folk, they are fine .. They're just
fed up with the going round in circles as well. Then of course there's the
silent majority. I know this because they contact me and tell me .. They
don't want the aggro so don't get roped in . they still support the
sentiment. So let us not underestimate the 'will' to overcome.

I will make my statement one more time. Yes, we here at Canalside did
understand the rules and implications at the outset (we didn't agree with
them, but hey, such is life)      what we DID NOT EXPECT THOUGH, is to be
arguing about the same things 12 years down the line and listening to hot
air coming from Ministers saying how much they support Community Radio
.....do something about it then.

I'll try to copy and paste ...(copy and rant)   :-)

Restrictions = Get Shot of the Lot

Regulate the spend and not the earn .. this way there would be technically a
limit (it would remain not-for-profit)   money earned would have to be
re-invested into the project and there is an element of protection for
Commercial Radio

Key Commitments ------- most of these were written (me included) with all
good intentions .. but in reality some not achievable. They contained items
that ticked boxes, wouldn't offend commercial radio and looked fluffy and
nice ... I was cringing whilst writing them as I would imagine many others
were. We were being pushed down a road that we didn't want to go down by the
way the rules have been laid out.

The final straw for me is seeing people being hauled over the coals for
completely trivial matters and words like 'investigation' 'in breach'    etc
being attached to that Station. Completely unacceptable.

Setting the Bar high and '''at least avin a go''' should be commended, not
ridiculed if you fall slightly short. This is obviously one of the reasons
why this 'consultation' has come about .however, like with everything else
it ought to have been done 3 years ago when folk like me and others saw the
warning lights flashing. It would possibly have saved me in total about a
month of my life off the e-mail and phone.

I stick by the word I first mentioned 8 years ago    'debacle'     I think
this was the word that upset one or two as I was on the receiving end of a
lecture. It of course went straight over my head.

Of course life is about opinions, some will agree, some will disagree ..but
one thing is for sure, if you do nothing about it, don't get involved, don't
roll your sleeves up, you will forever be trodden on.

Time to cut-loose and let Community Radio really flourish.

By the way, read the comments from 3 years ago   re:-TV ...... correct
again. It was never going to work and the money ought to have been put into
Community Radio. We'd have a descent Pot, Commercial Radio would be
protected (they'd like that)   and we'd only need to rummage through a few
adverts and everyone's a happy bunny.

I can't remember the Minister at the time (Jeremy Hunt possibly?)   but my
exact words to him were   ''don't you think you ought to be sorting out
Community Radio first, before mIthering with Community TV?'

I've virtually covered the entry, but I send it over

Love you all  xxx   keep on truckin'

Sir Hamster Wheel-Wright [University of Pott Shrigley]

By the way .. I think Ofcom have read it as there has been correspondence
this morning .and I reckon it's food for thought. My command of English
isn't good & sadly I didn't get A Level or O Level English as you can see
... The message is clear though and that's what matters.

  _____  

From: cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk
[mailto:cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk] On Behalf Of Richard Hilton
Sent: 16 October 2015 09:26
To: The Community Media Association Discussion List
Subject: Re: [cma-l] Review of the approach to community radioKey
Commitments

Glad you have done this.  Is it possible to share your submission as a guide
and encouragement to others to get involved in this vitally important
consultation?  

Richard

From: cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk
[mailto:cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk] On Behalf Of Canalside's The
Thread
Sent: 15 October 2015 19:35
To: 'The Community Media Association Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [cma-l] Review of the approach to community radio Key
Commitments

Done  and Dusted !

Seek under the headline/title  ----   ''not pussy-footying around''   [part
1 ''hot under the collar'']  [sub clause 4 ''haven't we been here 20 times
before?'']  [sub section 2b ''seeing is believing'']   [clause 5 ''it's
about time'']

Sir Nicholas Henry Hamster Wheel-Wright [Professor of Community Radio
Economics] [University of Pott Shrigley]

  _____  

From: cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk
[mailto:cma-l-bounces at mailman.commedia.org.uk] On Behalf Of CMA-L
Sent: 15 October 2015 17:35
To: cma-l at commedia.org.uk
Subject: [cma-l] Review of the approach to community radio Key Commitments

Community radio services broadcasting on FM or AM provide social gain and
other community benefits on a not-for-profit basis.

Each station is required to provide the service described in its licence,
which is based on the proposals it made during the application process for
the licence.

These service descriptions recorded in community radio licences are called
'Key Commitments'.

This Ofcom consultation seeks views on a proposal to streamline and simplify
the Key Commitments.

This will free up community radio stations, enabling them to focus on
serving their target communities, adapt better to the changing needs of
those communities, and deliver social gain.

Ofcom invites written comments on the questions raised in this consultation,
to be submitted by 5pm on 21 October 2015. Ofcom strongly prefers to receive
responses in electronic format and their web form will allow you to indicate
your data protection preferences and send your views to the team responsible
for this consultation.

http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/key-commitments/

\\

Community Media Association
--
http://www.commedia.org.uk/
http://twitter.com/community_media
https://www.facebook.com/CommunityMediaAssociation

Canstream Internet Radio & Video
http://www.canstream.co.uk/
https://twitter.com/canstream

  _____  

 <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> 

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>  protection is active. 

The information in this email is confidential and may be privileged. It is
for use by the addressee only. If you are not the addressee or if this email
is sent to you in error, please let us know by return and delete the email
from your computer. You may not copy it, or use its contents or disclose
them to another person. No liability is accepted for viruses and it is your
responsibility to scan any attachments. 

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/pipermail/cma-l/attachments/20151016/7ac66b53/attachment.html>