[cma-l] From CMA Council - we are meeting this Saturday in Sheffield

Sat Jul 23 18:19:09 BST 2011

Hi Peter

Thank you for your feedback on the government¹s plans for local TV.   Your
view that an existing digital mutiplex with added localisation via Œadd
drop¹ will provide the best platform for local and community TV is a
persuasive one, depending of course on the detail of the contract between
the operator and the local stations.  For me, the potential near
universality of coverage in this scenario is the strongest aspect of the
argument.  It¹s crucial that public service broadcasting continues to be as
widely available as technically possible.  The future potential for IPTV is
undeniable but again universality of access is a long way off - and the high
access charges and technical thresholds for Youview ensure that this will
not be a viable option for most local and community services.

Your views usefully inform the CMA response to the DCMS ŒFramework for Local
TV in the UK¹ document  open for consultation with a closing date of 23
September.

With best wishes

Phil

Phil Shepherd      
Chair of Council
Community Media Association
c/o Engine Room
52 High Street
Bridgwater
Somerset TA6 3BL 

philshep.wordpress.com

On 22/07/2011 15:25, "Peter Reid" <petersr001 at hotmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Hello.
> 
> Some thoughts on DCMS and local television (LTV).
> 
> Given that Jeremy Hunt has stated that LTV is one of his priorities, this
> week's proposals are deeply dissappointing.  Short of abandoning the idea
> altogether, they are just about the minimum that could have been offered,
> although the inclusion of the BBC money will sweeten the pill somewhat.
> 
> The use of an existing multiplex, with added localisation via "add-drop", to
> deliver LTV remains the best, and only serious way forward.  This would make
> LTV available to 98.5% of the population, assuming local operators come
> forward.  This would provide not only near universal access but also a strong
> economic base on which to build.  Restricting development to the use of the
> interleaved (GI) spectum restricts access to, allegedly, around 50% of the
> population, thus making it a postcode lottery.  However, the technical quality
> and the quality of coverage of this spectrum is far from proven and the use of
> it could cause as many problems as it solves, as happened with the TRSLs in
> the '90-00s.
> 
> The government's fallback position of offering future broadband/IPTV/YouView
> access for LTV puts progeress back for years.  It is still not clear when
> YouView will be avaialble and what its take-up will be; it will require a high
> speed broadband connection and it is still not clear when that will be
> universally available and what its take-up will be.  Relying on this to
> provide a platform on which to develop LTV seems  like a lack of serious
> committment.
> 
> Use of an existing multiplex then provides:
> 
>     Near universal access.
> 
>     A stong economic base on which to build.
> 
>     All the cultural, social, economic and democratic benefits that go with
> local media development.
> 
> Restriction to the GI spectrum and future YouView access:
> 
>     Provides only a piecemeal, postcode lottery development.
> 
>     Undermines the economic viability of LTV.
> 
>     Denies the cultural, social, economic and democratic benefits of local
> media to, probably, most of the population.
> 
> I would strongly argue therefore that Jeremy Hunt and the govenment should
> support LTV dvelopment by providing access to an existing digital multiplex.
> 
> All best,
> 
> Peter Reid.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:25:37 +0100
>> > From: phil at somersetfilm.com
>> > To: cma-l at commedia.org.uk
>> > Subject: [cma-l] From CMA Council - we are meeting this Saturday in
>> Sheffield
>> > 
>> > Dear Members and Friends
>> >  
>> > The new Council meets this weekend in Sheffield.  I am looking forward to
>> > getting together with existing and new members to discuss the issues of the
>> > day and to support our staff in taking the next steps forward.   This
>> summer
>> > sees several new contracts in place that are directly benefiting some of >>
our
>> > licensed radio members as well as the core CMA service and I look forward
>> > with optimism to seeing us grow from strength to strength from here on in.
>> >  
>> > For avoidance of doubt - at the AGM we discussed the fact that both
>> > Treasurer Richard Hilton and myself as Chair were due to stand down from
>> > Council this year, having each completed three consecutive terms, the
>> > maximum allowed by our rules.  This issue had  already been discussed at
>> > Council and it was agreed to propose that both of us remain in our
>> executive
>> > posts (of Treasurer and Chair) for a further 6-12 months and/or until such
>> > time as succession can be worked through and other officers appointed.   At
>> > the AGM it was agreed to mandate the newly elected Council to co-opt
>> Richard
>> > and myself in the way described at their next meeting if they felt the
>> > proposal to be appropriate.  The co-option duly took place at the customary
>> > brief Council meeting held in the late afternoon of the AGM day.
>> >  
>> > During this interim period Richard and I will not have a vote on Council >>
but
>> > will otherwise continue to conduct its business as before.  This has been
>> > agreed as necessary because of the difficult period we have just been
>> > through (for the last four years at least!) and the executive's need for
>> > continuity in the hopefully now emerging transition to a more sustainable
>> > model.
>> >  
>> > I look forward to helping make this a great year for the CMA and hope this
>> > clarifies what is happening organisation wise.
>> >  
>> > Please let us know if you have anything you would like us to think about
>> > when we meet on Saturday.  In particular, I would be interested in hearing
>> > feedback on the government's new consultation paper on local TV.
>> >  
>> > Download it at <http://www.culture.gov.uk/consultations/8298.aspx>
>> >  
>> > Personally I agree with a lot of it although I believe the revised model
>> > proposed will still not work well for communities in practice.  CMA and
>> ULTV
>> > are severally and jointly preparing responses so please let us know what >>
you
>> > think.
>> >  
>> > Hope to hear from you.
>> >  
>> > With best wishes
>> >  
>> > Phil
>> > 
>> > For CMA Council
>> >  
>> >  
>> > 
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > 
>> > Reply - cma-l at commedia.org.uk
>> > 
>> > The cma-l mailing list is a members' service provided by the Community
>> Media Association - http://www.commedia.org.uk
>> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/community_media
>> > http://www.facebook.com/CommunityMediaAssociation
>> > Canstream Internet Radio & Video: http://www.canstream.co.uk/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > 
>> > Mailing list guidelines:
>> http://www.commedia.org.uk/about/cma-email-lists/email-list-guidelines/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > 
>> > To unsubscribe or manage your CMA-L mailing list subscription please visit:
>> > http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l
>        
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Reply - cma-l at commedia.org.uk
> 
> The cma-l mailing list is a members' service provided by the Community Media
> Association - http://www.commedia.org.uk
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/community_media
> http://www.facebook.com/CommunityMediaAssociation
> Canstream Internet Radio & Video: http://www.canstream.co.uk/
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Mailing list guidelines:
> http://www.commedia.org.uk/about/cma-email-lists/email-list-guidelines/
> _______________________________________________
> 
> To unsubscribe or manage your CMA-L mailing list subscription please visit:
> http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/pipermail/cma-l/attachments/20110723/8b2b6ded/attachment.html>