[cma-l] Frustrated campaigning
Phil Shep
phil at somersetfilm.com
Sun May 16 14:38:42 BST 2010
Dear Marilyn
Your input is always so on the money for me, I wish there were more
opportunities to thrash all this stuff out. A pro active approach
where we bring the funders to the strength of our idea rather than
waiting for the next twist in the policy road would be great. And yes
let's look at how we follow things up, mobilise support when the
issues and opportunities arise, there is a tie in to regional
structure there, once we know when and where the agm is - the detail
of which is itself contingent on available resources - let's support
Jaqui in creating an agenda which really gets to the nub of this ( not
that Jaqui won't anyway be doing just that!) and set a course for
future which everyone can get behind and contribute to...
Best wishes
Phil
On 16 May 2010, at 13:14, Marilyn Hyndman
<marilyn at northernvisions.org> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Not suggesting that nothing is being done.. I have also been to
> meetings and been promised that various things will be considered, I
> guess many of us have, I understand how frustrating all of this is
> and I know it often comes down to a few groups/individuals in a
> sector to keep the torch alight, more is the pity.
>
> .....what I am trying to get at is how to make this process better.
> For example, with Lottery, should there not have been an immediate
> protest by the sector ... maybe there was an equality issue here,
> other forms of activity/sectors are recognised... first I have heard
> of all of this, always thought nothing had been done, perhaps that
> is my fault and I didn't read the emails.
>
> So, process ... how is everything followed up, should there be an
> automatic call on the sector, a rallying of the troops once a
> decision has been made by some quango we are all beholden to?
>
> Not sure about these bids like EQUAL either, always contorting to
> someone else's misconceived view of the world. Should we not be pro-
> active and propose our own large scale project and then look for a
> cocktail of funders? Perhaps that is where your regional idea can
> come in?
>
> But nothing less than several £million as a target.....?
>
> All the best,
> Marilyn
>
>
>
>
>
> On 16 May 2010, at 12:55, Phil Shep wrote:
>
>> Hi Marilyn
>>
>> We did approach Lottery about three years ago arguing for a
>> dedicated funding stream for community media. I met the head of Big
>> lottery to that effect and was promised that it would be considered
>> in what is now their recent review. Nothing came of that. All these
>> initiatives - as we know from the local TV campaign - require
>> concerted and long term input to stand any chance of success.
>> Digital switchover is another and again it's not that nothing's
>> being done, but arguably as much as is feasible with limited
>> capacity.
>>
>> How to increase capacity? It's argued by some that CMA should focus
>> more on large scale funding bids like Equal of old. They are of
>> course very time consuming and success uncertain at best. We do
>> have several financial irons in the fire right now which if
>> succesful wll free up time to add strength to the policy arguments
>> we are making. Yes community media does need to become recognised
>> as a legitimate sector in it's own right and from my experience bit
>> by bit that is becoming the case. It's nowhere near fast enough,
>> it's not teanslating into pund notes and progress is patchy.
>>
>> Incidentally and to answer another point raised in the list today
>> academic support is critical to that profile raising - vital to
>> being taken seriously in the wider world. We welcome that input to
>> Council.
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Phil
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I
>>
>>
>>
>> On 16 May 2010, at 12:25, Marilyn Hyndman <marilyn at northernvisions.org
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> Perhaps it might be easier to gauge if there was a breakdown of
>>> what is happening in each 'region' already.
>>>
>>> I can see how strategic alliances could be formed to lobby
>>> regional bodies, arts councils, screen commissions, economic
>>> development bodies etc, those bodies that have a regional or
>>> nation set up but there are hidden dangers in this because what
>>> you really need is a national (UK) recognition of the importance
>>> of community media... these bodies all have differing policies and
>>> criteria already, none of this is uniform when it comes to
>>> community media and quite a lot of times community media does not
>>> figure in any of this, and/or is not understood very well.
>>>
>>> Does community media not need to be accepted as an 'activity',
>>> 'sector' call it what you will, the same way independent film or
>>> literature or drama or even community development is and with a
>>> funding stream, preferably a dedicated funding stream.
>>>
>>> One area we have plugged for a long time is Lottery but no one in
>>> CMA has thought it important to take up. A unified policy and
>>> criteria with Lottery for community media as a good cause would
>>> help, similarly with Skillset, Arts Councils, economic development
>>> boards ... though easier if this was agreed with DCMS and filtered
>>> down to these bodies as a directive rather than a massive
>>> undertaking by a sector lobbying in their own areas and already
>>> under pressure?
>>>
>>> The other area is the Digital Switchover fund ... again surely
>>> best done on a UK basis? Where is the strategy on this, does this
>>> not need to be sorted pretty sharply?
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>> Marilyn
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 May 2010, at 12:02, Phil Shep wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Marilyn
>>>>
>>>> I take your point and like the idea of communitiesof interest. I
>>>> think the regional thing I'd important too though -when regional
>>>> events have occasionally taken place they have always proved
>>>> valuable - asides and information exchanges, as sources of
>>>> inspiration for the embattled - inculcating a sense of engagement
>>>> and ownership which us important in a membership organisation. I
>>>> think this feeds back to the centre too, active support on the
>>>> ground manifesting for example through joined up approaches to
>>>> MPs surgeries etc. It's about the local agenda too, not just
>>>> because our new gov tkd about it but because it has to be the
>>>> future surely.
>>>>
>>>> It's not an either / or - communities of interest would certainly
>>>> be good.
>>>>
>>>> Phil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 16 May 2010, at 11:02, Marilyn Hyndman <marilyn at northernvisions.org
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Whilst regional and local strategy is important, the CMA is a UK
>>>>> organisation and is it not the strategic development between
>>>>> government and organisations nationally which has stalled and
>>>>> caused so much frustration?
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it not be better for us all to understand why that is and
>>>>> if anything could be done better ..... before going off in other
>>>>> directions which may lead us up blind alleys?
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, how do regional strategies key into the big picture
>>>>> if the big picture is not understood or is failing?
>>>>>
>>>>> All you would be doing in that scenario is adding another layer
>>>>> of frustration as the centre fails to deliver with far more
>>>>> chance that the sector will fracture?
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if it would not be better to have communities of
>>>>> interest rather than a regional structure which given the nature
>>>>> of the sector will surely be very uneven across the country.
>>>>>
>>>>> Groupings which take up issues important for the whole UK sector
>>>>> and put their energies into that?
>>>>>
>>>>> M
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 15 May 2010, at 09:51, Phil Shep wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear all
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There has long been a need for more joined up regional
>>>>>>>> working within CMA and this fact has not been lost on staff
>>>>>>>> and council. Our great frustration in recent years has been a
>>>>>>>> lack of capacity to do more to make this happen on the
>>>>>>>> ground. Jaqui and the team go well beyond the call of duty on
>>>>>>>> a daily basis to hold the line for the sector, to make sure
>>>>>>>> we are represented at the key conversations, to provide the
>>>>>>>> tech and information support which is so useful to us all.
>>>>>>>> But holding the line is necessarily where we have been at for
>>>>>>>> quite a while and as a sector we need to look at how we can
>>>>>>>> work more effectively together to addresss this - and for me
>>>>>>>> the key is in regional working.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Again, capacity rears its head - yes we're all busy - but
>>>>>>>> also at times we are short-sighted when we build alliances
>>>>>>>> with others and fail to key in our collective strength to the
>>>>>>>> bigger picture .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As has been observed, there is too often a disconnect between
>>>>>>>> the passionate ideas expressed and the ability of the tiny
>>>>>>>> over- stretched core to follow up the ideas - the ones
>>>>>>>> couched in reality at least! If we were meeting regularly at
>>>>>>>> a regional level we could do much more to mobilise grass
>>>>>>>> roots campaigning.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just here in Somerset we have at least six CR stations and
>>>>>>>> other CM projects within a fifty mile radius and while there
>>>>>>>> is at times I know, good and positive communication flowing
>>>>>>>> between projects this rarely translates into joined up
>>>>>>>> campaigns which key into the bigger picture. Let's really
>>>>>>>> tackle this one at the AGM this year - it's overdue and would
>>>>>>>> I think obviate some of the frustrations expressed recently
>>>>>>>> on this list. I've got a year left at most as Chair and
>>>>>>>> would like to to do as much as possible in that time to put
>>>>>>>> the beginnings of a working regional structure in place.
>>>>>>>> Let me know what you think.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And yes to echo others, if you've got time and energy to
>>>>>>>> give,please do consider standing for council. We need all
>>>>>>>> the expertise and energy we can muster to help take us all
>>>>>>>> forward.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best wishes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Phil
>>>>>>>> Chair of Council
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cma-l mailing list - cma-l at commedia.org.uk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Community Media Association - www.commedia.org.uk
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To manage your mailing list subscription please visit:
>>>>>> http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cma-l
>>>>>
>>>>> Marilyn Hyndman
>>>>> Northern Visions/NvTv
>>>>> 23 Donegall Street
>>>>> Belfast
>>>>> BT1 2FF
>>>>>
>>>>> Tel: 028 9024 5495 ext 207
>>>>> Fax: 028 9032 6608
>>>>>
>>>>> NvTv
>>>>> Belfast Community Television
>>>>> Free-to-Air on Channel 62/Freq:799.276MHz
>>>>> Live on line: www.nvtv.co.uk
>>>>>
>>>>> www.northernvisions.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Marilyn Hyndman
>>> Northern Visions/NvTv
>>> 23 Donegall Street
>>> Belfast
>>> BT1 2FF
>>>
>>> Tel: 028 9024 5495 ext 207
>>> Fax: 028 9032 6608
>>>
>>> NvTv
>>> Belfast Community Television
>>> Free-to-Air on Channel 62/Freq:799.276MHz
>>> Live on line: www.nvtv.co.uk
>>>
>>> www.northernvisions.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> Marilyn Hyndman
> Northern Visions/NvTv
> 23 Donegall Street
> Belfast
> BT1 2FF
>
> Tel: 028 9024 5495 ext 207
> Fax: 028 9032 6608
>
> NvTv
> Belfast Community Television
> Free-to-Air on Channel 62/Freq:799.276MHz
> Live on line: www.nvtv.co.uk
>
> www.northernvisions.org
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.commedia.org.uk/pipermail/cma-l/attachments/20100516/208ed5ce/attachment.html>
More information about the cma-l
mailing list