[cma-l] Commercial Radio Proposals for Change
Karl Hartland
hartland.karl at 209radio.co.uk
Mon Apr 20 09:14:56 BST 2009
FROM RADIO TODAY - POSTED FOR INTEREST ONLY, ALL OF THE BELOW IS QUOTE
Are you an A, B, C, D or E?
John Myers and his team have organised every radio station in the UK in
to a particular category. The proposal to deal with radio stations via
categories with appropriate regulation and rules for each seems a step
in the right direction, and maybe even a little long overdue.
The move from output to input has been introduced over the last few
years but the proposal now is to really concentrate on that idea, and
make sure each local radio station is delivering local content, day
after day. After day. The Local Impact Test has the thumbs up from most
people, we would guess.
Whether you have read the report (not much work took place on Thursday
afternoon across the industry then?) or just enjoyed the numerous blogs
and reports about it, you’ll be aware that John’s proposals, in a
nutshell, will make sure local radio stations are broadcasting local
content (even if they are based 100 miles away, and co-located with 10
other stations), and regional stations can group together (literally and
physically) to form a national network.
Based on these proposals, let’s play a game of predicting the future of
commercial radio, in a digital spy anorak type way.
Category B radio stations will be allowed to co-locate to anywhere
within their region (or country). So Kingdom FM, Original 106, Central
FM, L107, Northsound, West FM, South West Sound, Moray Firth, SIBC,
Nevis, etc etc would, theoretically be able to join forces and create a
super broadcasting centre in Edinburgh. Or Glasgow. Or the Shetland
Islands. If all the independent owners agree of course.
Let’s just take a moment to think about that.
Once you get your head around the fact that local radio can be produced
from anywhere, then the possibilities are endless Scary but endless.
In a constructive debate in the pub over the weekend, one presenter, who
hosted the breakfast show on a local station for many years, argued that
a local station needs to live and breathe the area it serves. This was
the same presenter who lived outside the TSA, drove 30 miles in to the
area on a motorway at 5am, entered the out of town industrial estate,
and drove away again at midday via the same route. He could have very
easily drove 30 miles in the opposite direction to a “hub”, and
presented exactly the same show. Couldn’t he?
Hub’s are not ideal – but in times of crisis, it appears to be a
sensible cost-saving alternative.
Take a typical county the size of Lancashire. You could quite easily,
despite different ownership, have a local station for each major town or
borough operating from the centre of the area. Or even, as suggested,
merging the licences and retaining local news on each frequency.
“Lancashire FM” could be broadcasting from Preston 24 hours a day, but
with local news and feature opt outs for Blackpool (96.5), Lancaster
(96.9), Blackburn (107), Preston (106.5), Burnley (99.8) etc.
Sounds too outrageous? If it was a choice between closing down, or
joining forces, which one would you prefer?
The other proposal by John and his team which we’d like to theorise on,
suggests category D stations, (regional’s) could broadcast from ANYWHERE
in the UK. This would allow all Real, Smooth, Galaxy, Kiss and regional
Heart stations to broadcast from one single location with all localness
and location restrictions rescinded. (Providing that brand is available
to 65% of the UK population on DAB).
Could this be taken too far? A smaller station (category C, over 700,000
TSA) which is part of a national brand could be upgraded to category D,
if the brand is available to most of the population on DAB. Such as
Galaxy Manchester and Smooth Glasgow.
So, (play along here), in theory, Global Radio could own and operate
three radio stations in Manchester, (Galaxy, Gold and Xfm) without
having a studio in the city. All three would need to be “grandfathered
to a category D station”, and available nationally, but these proposals
could see situations like this developing.
But whilst all these ideas are just proposals, they have the backing of
RadioCentre, and are not to dis-similar from other recent recommendations.
Is this the beginning of the end for local commercial radio, or the end
of the beginning? Whatever it is, and whatever it turns out to be, we'd
better all faster our seat belts because we're in for a bumpy ride.
--
Karl Hartland
209radio Station Manager
105 FM in the Cambridge City Area
http://209radio.co.uk everywhere else!
Citylife House
Sturton Street
Cambridge
CB1 2QF
01223 488418
07968 898254
209radio is a Registered Charity in England, No. 1124610,
and a Company Limited by Guarantee, No. 5585527
This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. Any
views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of 209radio Ltd.
If you are not the intended recipient of this email and its attachments,
you must take no action based upon them, nor must you copy or show them
to anyone.
Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in
error.
More information about the cma-l
mailing list